The Coca-Cola Company Struggles with Ethical Crises Research Paper

The Coca-Cola Company Struggles with Ethical Crises - Research Paper ExampleAll these contamination issues were further worsen by the slow response from the beverage manufacturer and failure to recognize the severity of the situation. In Belgium, the bucolics strict antitrust laws upheld a halt on market strategy seen as mislabeled strategy to strengthen Coca-Colas market share. The composition of the company was thus deteriorating at an increasing rate. patch considering mergers and acquisition, the companys marketing tactics came under scrutiny due to the strict antitrust laws in the European countries. The french government refused to approve the companys bid to acquire Origina and Schweppes, other French beverage companies. But still, the company dominates foreign markets throughout the world. Further, claims of racial discrimination came up in the beginning of 1999. It is claimed that the top management had knowledge of this since 1995 and had done nothing to neutralize t his situation. Discrimination was alleged to take post among former and current black employees. Over two thousands of them are said to have been discriminated in basis of promotions, pay and performance evaluations. A mid-level executive accused the Coca-Cola Company of doctoring a study it had done on behalf of Burger King in 2002. The fast food outlet had to take the research on its own to realize the reality of the claims. Coca-Cola was found guilty and had to compensate Burger Kings, the whistle-blower as well as pay millions in pre-tax write offs. It further lost public image among its customers, stakeholders as criminal investigations were instituted. Channel stuffing rapture additional bloodline at above board rates to retailers and wholesalers are allegations came up. This was aimed at manipulating the numbers vindicatory before the end of a quarter to create a strong demand picture. This makes the financial line of reasoning earning impressive to the investors. Fro m 1997 through 1999, the company was accused of this in the Japanese market. Coca-Cola is facing a shareholder display case regarding this kind of actions in any case in the Europe, North America and South Africa markets. Other supplies of the company such as PowerAde a sports drink- came under scrutiny. Its delivery to Wal-Mart beyond Texas test area was looked into as bottlers alleged the contracts engaged in did not permit such. Initially the company was using direct store delivery, bottlers dropped off products to all stores, stock shelves and building merchandising displays. Bottlers did claim diminishing of their businesses due to this new change of delivery tactic and also a violation of antitrust laws. The media reported this wrangle negatively hence costing the company its reputation as well as the reputation of firms within its supply chain. The integrity the company had across its shareholders and partners was eroded. inner(a) wars with kernels were up around the sam e time in Colombia. The death of eight Coca-Cola workers, hiding of further twoscore eight and sixty five receiving death threats was attributed to Coca-Cola and its local bottler by the union though it was a coincidence. The union sought reparations to families of slain workers as well as the displaced. The companies denied all these claims and attribute them to the Colombias four ten dollar bill long civil war. There was an arrest of an administrative secretary and two accomplices in 2006. Fraud charges were brought against them as well as stealing and trading